葡萄牙足球巨星「C羅」羅納度（Cristiano Ronaldo）9月30日無預警提前離開國家隊位於哥本哈根的訓練營，並缺席之後國家隊在歐洲足總國家聯賽（簡稱歐國聯）的比賽。為此，C羅本週二（10月6日）公開道歉，表態願意重返國家隊，但也同時控訴葡萄牙新任總教練傑蘇斯（Jorge Jesus）兩度違背承諾。
C羅曾點頭傑蘇斯接掌國家隊
這起事件源於C羅與傑蘇斯之間的信任危機。C羅在週二最新發文中透露，今年世界盃後他本有意告別國家隊，但因葡萄牙足協（FPF）主席一再挽留而打消念頭。當時主席更主動徵詢他對現任教練人選的看法，C羅也親自點頭力挺傑蘇斯是「合適人選」。
隨後雙方在足球城面談時，傑蘇斯也親口向C羅承諾，他對球隊至關重要，並具體安排他會參加歐國聯第一場與最後一場比賽，其餘賽事則基於體能管理，每場進行3至4次換人調整。
教練「連番食言」成C羅離隊導火線
C羅接著指出，在對陣挪威的比賽前，教練曾詢問他能否出賽30分鐘，他答應後也在下半場積極熱身，最終卻全場苦坐板凳。賽後雙方雖達成共識，教練承諾會在下一場對戰丹麥前的記者會上公開說明並道歉，不料教練隨後不僅直接宣布C羅不列入首發，在記者會上的說法更與私下協議完全不同。
｜延伸閱讀｜葡萄牙男足新主帥調動引爆內鬨 C羅不滿「坐板凳」退出歐國聯集訓
不願再忍受教練接連食言的C羅因而決定直接離隊。事後他發表正式聲明，坦承自己衝動離隊的處理方式並不恰當，並公開向隊友及葡萄牙人民致歉。
C羅強調自己願意承擔全責，並坦然接受葡萄牙足球協會任何停賽處分，同時也表態這不代表退出國家隊，未來仍隨時準備好為國效力。
讓C羅坐板凳是為「留面子給傳奇」？
目前葡萄牙足協尚未對C羅最新聲明做出回應，傑蘇斯則在C羅9月30日退出國家隊後重申自己的執教立場。他在葡萄牙與挪威賽後，強硬反駁外界盛傳他曾召開閉門會議並向C羅致歉的說法，「這是捏造的假消息。我為什麼要向任何人道歉？道歉的名目到底是什麼？」
傑蘇斯直言，只因C羅對國家隊具特殊意義，普通的戰術調度才會被炒作成天大風暴；當天特意拉長他的熱身時間，初衷完全是為了顧及這位國家隊傳奇的顏面。他並強調「沒有人的球員生涯能永遠持續」，球隊運作絕不因個人停滯，雖仍歡迎C羅重返國家隊，但前提是必須接受教練團的調度與規章。
🎥🚨 Full transcription of Jorge Jesus’ statements when asked about Cristiano Ronaldo in today’s press conference ahead of their match against Denmark tomorrow… 🇵🇹🗣 Jorge Jesus: “Before answering the question, I want to make an interruption. For me, the most important thing, the most important thing, is the objective of what we have come here to do against Denmark. It is about respecting the opponent. We are going to play against a great opponent, with the ambition of continuing to win the Nations League. I don’t have one player, I have 23 players, and you can ask whatever questions you want about any player. But I’ll answer your question. As for Ronaldo, one question is not enough, three is too many. I will only answer two questions about Ronaldo, and then I won’t answer any more, because Ronaldo is not the main reason I am here. The main reason I am here is Denmark, and the fact that I am the national team coach. Now, to answer your question specifically. I have it memorised, but can you repeat it?” Journalist: “Whether coach Jorge Jesus agreed with Ronaldo on his playing time, and whether he refused to train yesterday with the national team.” 🇵🇹🗣 Jorge Jesus: “Well, it is true that I agreed something with him. But I didn’t only agree it with him. We also created a plan, as I did with Bruno Fernandes. I told Cris that he would not play in the game against Norway or the game against Denmark. He would not play because I believed that was the right thing to do. I worked with Cris for a year. I didn’t arrive at the national team three months ago and meet Cris. I worked with Cris for a year. I know his physical condition completely. I know because I already did this with him in Saudi Arabia. When there were games every three days, Cris rarely played. Furthermore, Cris never trains on the first day or the second day after a game. Never. He spent a year with me and never did. So, I agreed this with him. Before the game, I told him, and when we had our first press conference in Portugal, he also spoke about this. He said that whatever the coach wanted, whether he was asked to play or sit on the bench, he would sit on the bench. So, he never refused anything, and that is exactly what happened. But I am a coach who does not go to the bench thinking, ‘In 60 minutes I’m going to have Carlos Daniel,’ or, ‘In 70 minutes I’m going to have…’ That is not how I work on the bench. The game tells me what I am going to do. I thought that perhaps I had agreed with him that he would not play the first two games. But perhaps I would need him in the final minutes. However, the game dictated other things. It started telling me other things, and I did not put him on the pitch. That is the real point. And since I am talking about Cris, let me tell you something. I worked with Cris for a year. It seems as though there is some kind of issue between me and him. There is no issue at all. I have had issues with many players, but don’t turn this into an issue that does not exist. This was a coaching decision. I had a plan. If you want, I’ll also tell you about Bruno. Bruno, in the game against Norway, I told him… Bruno came after the game against… It was exactly the same. What does this tell you? It tells you something about the question I was asked earlier about a player having status, doesn’t it? Status is one thing. The rules are the same for everyone. Now, status allows the coach, or at least it does in my case, because of the players’ careers and what they have achieved, to be a little more careful about certain decisions before the game takes place. After the game takes place, it is the same. The coach has to make the decision. That is how I think, and I always make decisions based on one objective, which is what is best for the team, while always respecting the players…" https://t.co/NuZ5k8oS9L
— The Nassr Tribune™️ (@AlNassrTribune) September 30, 2026
